Articles — Book

Karisák.

Provides an Extensive Guide to LaTeX along with the source code. This provides a template for documentation.

selamat menikmati

My documentation report Objective: Explain what I did and how, so someone can continue with the investigation Important note: Chapter heading images should have a 2:1 width:height ratio, e.g. 920px width and 460px height. Note: This was produced using the Legrand Orange Book template, available here. Original author of the Legrand Orange Book template: Mathias Legrand (legrand.mathias@gmail.com) with modifications by: Vel (vel@latextemplates.com) Original License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

Le modèle linéaire mixte a été mis en oeuvre dès les années 1950, essentiellement dans le domaine de la génétique animale (réf. Henderson[1],[2]). Il n’a toutefois connu une utilisation plus générale qu’au cours des années 1990, en relation avec le développement de nouvelles procédures de calcul dans le cadre des logiciels statistiques. L’utilisation du modèle linéaire mixte soulève, par rapport aux modèles classiques d’analyse de la variance, un certain nombre de difficultés particulières, tant en ce qui concerne l’estimation des différents paramètres que la réalisation des tests d’hypothèses. Des informations peuvent être trouvées à ce sujet dans les articles de Littell [2002], McLean et al. [1991], et Piepho et al. [2003], et dans les livres de Demidenko [2004], McCulloch et Searle [2001],

El presengte trabajo tiene como objetivo dar a conocer las bondades de los modelos Logit y probit dentro del campo de la estimación de modelos con variable endógena discreta dicotómica. Template Details: The Legrand Orange Book LaTeX Template Version 2.0 (9/2/15) This template has been downloaded from: http://www.LaTeXTemplates.com Mathias Legrand (legrand.mathias@gmail.com) with modifications by: Vel (vel@latextemplates.com) License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/)

PDE-ONE DIMENSIONAL PDE-TWO DIMENSIONAL

#9774 Nano Ninjas is a rookie FTC Team consisting of fifteen girls in seventh and eighth grade and is a neighborhood team located in Portland, OR. This is our Engineering Notebook capturing every moment of of FTC journey. Read more about our amazing project in our story on the Overleaf blog. This is a big, detailed report at 300+ pages, so give it a few seconds to load! :-)

Emerging technologies continue to transform the ways we collect, synthesize, disseminate, and consume information. These advances present both hazards and opportunities for the future of scholarly publication and communication. During this book sprint—presented by the Center for Science and the Imagination at Arizona State University and the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) and embedded in SSP’s 2016 annual meeting in Vancouver—we discussed issues of increasing scholarly impact and accessibility, wondered whether computers can make scholarly contributions that warrant co-authorship, speculated about what forms scholarly books may take in the future, and more. Tackling ambitious and often ambiguous questions like these requires a diverse group of thinkers and writers and an innovative approach to writing. The book sprint method provides this innovation. Throughout the annual meeting, we held six miniature book sprints. During each sprint, we convened a group of four to six writers to tackle one of six big questions. Each sprint began with a facilitated conversation, followed by time for our writers to reflect and compose a piece of writing inspired by the conversation. Each piece was composed on Overleaf using this template specially created for this undertaking. Conferences like the SSP annual meeting and scholarly publications themselves are often undergirded by spontaneous, inspiring, thought-provoking conversations among colleagues and collaborators, but those conversations are rarely captured and shared, and are often clouded in memory, even for the participants. The book sprint process hopefully absorbs some of the kismet and energy of those initial conversations, right at the start of a big idea, and makes it part of a more durable intellectual product—and a possible springboard for additional conversations in a broader range of times and places. The work would not have been possible without the contributions of our four core sprinters—Madeline Ashby, Annalee Newitz, Roopika Risam, and Ido Roll—who participated in every session, and the many SSP members who participated in the individual sprints and shared their expertise. All of our content is free to read at http://sprintbeyondthebook.com, and free to download and share under a Creative Commons license.